bewerbung_en_2024-02-29

1) Contact information and submission of paper

First and last name

E-Mail address

Please upload your paper here:

(Only PDF files / max. 5MB)

I confirm that the submitted paper...

... has been completed primarily at the Department of Psychology (I was employed / enrolled).

Yes

... has been completed in the previous year.

Yes

... is one of the following:

an Expra report a Master's thesis a PhD paper a Postdoc paper

2) Basic information on open-science practices

As outlined on our website we generally endorse four basic principles of open science. Yet, we are aware that under specific circumstances it may not be possible to fully adhere to all of these principles. Should this be the case in your paper, please provide a brief explanation below and your application will still be fully considered for the Open Science Prize.

The submitted paper...

... adheres to the principle of "open plans" (i.e., the hypotheses, study design, and analysis plan were preregistered).

No Yes

... adheres to the principle of "open materials and data" (i.e., the study materials and / or data are publicly available).

No Yes

... adheres to the principle of "open code" (i.e., the analysis code is publicly available).

No Yes

... adheres to the principle of "open access" (i.e., a version of the paper is publicly available without the need of a subsc

No Yes

Provided that you could not respond "yes" to all of the above question, please describe the reasons in the following field.

3) Detailed information on open-science practices

The following questions help us make a fine-grained evaluation of your work. Please answer as many of the questions as possible.

(01) This paper is a replication study.

No Yes

(02) This paper is a registered report (stage 1)

No Yes

(03) This paper is a registered report (stage 2)

No Yes

(04) The hypotheses were registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(05) The design and variables were registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(06) The aspired sample size and criteria for stopping data collection were registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(07) The motivation and procedure to determine the sample size (power analysis or prospective design analysis) were registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(08) The analysis plan was registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(09) The analysis code was registered at osf.io, aspredicted.org, or similar.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(10) If there were any deviations from the preregistered sample size or sampling procedure, these were transparently reported in the final paper.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(11) Provided that there was no prior power analysis or if the aspired sample size could not be collected, are the respective reasons and / or implications of a low power discussed in the final paper?

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(12) If there were any deviations from the preregistered analysis plan, these were transparently reported in the final paper.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(13) If there were any deviations from the preregistered analysis code, these were transparently reported in the final paper.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(14) The paper clearly delineates confirmatory from exploratory analyses.

No Yes Not applicable

(15) The reported data are new in the sense that they were published for the first time in a public repository.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(16) The paper (re)-analyzed publicly available data.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(17) The raw data and analysis code are publicly accessible such that the analyses can be replicated.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(18) Well-documented analysis code has been made publicly available.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(19) A codebook / data dictionary has been made publicly available such that an independent person can replicate the analyses.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(20) The data were analyzed with non-proprietary software.

No Yes Not applicable

(21) The study materials (instructions, stimuli, questionnaires, tasks) were made publicly available such that an independent person can replicate the study.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(22) The paper has been made publicly accessible prior to its final publication (i.e., preprint on psyarxiv.com, ZORA).

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(23) The paper was published in an open-access journal.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(24) The paper has been published in a fully open-access journal.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(25) The paper has been published in a journal with open peer review.

No Yes Not applicable

Please provide the URL or exact page numbers.

(26) I have also done the following to make the research reported in this better reproducible: